Innovations and income inequalities – a comparative study

Information
Title: Innovations and income inequalities – a comparative study
Issue: Vol. 10, No 4, 2017
Published date: 12-2017 (print) / 12-2017 (online)
Journal: Journal of International Studies
ISSN: 2071-8330, eISSN: 2306-3483
Authors: Julia Włodarczyk
Department of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice
Keywords: innovations, income inequalities, economic growth
DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-4/13
DOAJ: https://doaj.org/article/ada654b5bddd48eeb3e21d36efd49cf8
Language: English
Pages: 166-178 (13)
JEL classification: O11, O33, D63
Website: http://jois.eu/?385,en_innovations-and-income-inequalities-%E2%80%93-a-comparative-study
File https://www.jois.eu/files/13_328_Wlodarczyk.pdf
Abstract

Due to the complexity of relationships between innovations and income inequalities, the choice of measures to be taken in the course of their interaction is very important. This paper presents a regression analysis based on the selected measures of innovativeness (gross domestic expenditure on R&D, number of patent applications, the Creative Economy Index), income inequalities (Gini coefficient, top 3% and top 1% shares of national equalized income) and various control variables retrieved mostly from the Eurostat Database for 30 countries (European Union countries, Iceland, Norway) for the study period of 2005-2014. It has been found that higher gross domestic expenditure on R&D as a percentage of GDP tends to increase inequalities, while higher number of patent applications and higher value of the Creative Economy Index have the opposite effect. Besides, top income inequality is partly driven by different factors than broader measures of income inequalities.

Bibliography

1. Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings, in: Ashenfelter, O., & Card, D. (eds.): Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4B, Elsevier, 1043-1171. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5

2. Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica, 70(3), 855-882.

3. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Bergeaud, A., Blundell, R., & Hémous, D. (2015). Innovation and top income inequality. INSEAD Working Paper Series, 2015/50/EPS.

4. Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615-1660. doi:10.1257/jel.37.4.1615

5. Albanesi, S. (2007). Inflation and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1088-1114.

6. Antonelli, C., & Gehringer, A. (2017). Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.023

7. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3-71. doi:10.1257/jel.49.1.3

8. Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333. doi:10.1162/003355303322552801

9. Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2006). What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), 163-192.

10. Chinn, M. D., & Ito, H. (2016). Retrieved from http://web.pdx.edu/~ito/Chinn-Ito_website.htm.

11. Eurostat (2017). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.

12. Iacopetta, M. (2008). Technological progress and inequality: an ambiguous relationship. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 455-475. doi:10.1007/s00191-008-0100-1

13. Jaumotte, F., Lall, S., & Papageorgiou, Ch. (2013). Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 271-309.

14. Jones, C. I., & Kim J. (2017). A Schumpeterian Model of Top Income Inequality. Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.

15. Katz, L. F., & Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 35-78.

16. Kierzenkowski, R., & Koske, I. (2013). The Drivers Of Labor Income Inequality - A Literature Review, Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 4(01), 1-32. doi:10.1142/S179399331350004X

17. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.

18. Lemieux, T. (2008). The changing nature of wage inequality. Journal of Population Economics, 21(1), 21-48.

19. Peters, H., & Volwahsen, M. (2017). Rising Income Inequality: Do Not Draw the Obvious Conclusions. Intereconomics, 52(2) 111-118.

20. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 1-39.

21. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149-159.

22. Statistics Iceland (2017). Retrieved from http://statice.is/statistics/economy/national-accounts/financial-accounts/

23. Włodarczyk, J. (2013). Nierówności dochodowe w Polsce według rozkładów Pareto i Boltzmanna-Gibbsa. Studia Ekonomiczne, 130, 76-87.

24. World Bank (2017). Doing Business project. Retrieved from http://www.doingbusiness.org.

25. Żelazny, R., & Pietrucha, J. (2017). Measuring innovation and institution. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1), 43-62. doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i1.3