Modelling the environmental concerns of constructing the Danube-Morava-Vardar-Thessaloniki Canal using General Morphological Analysis

Information
Title: Modelling the environmental concerns of constructing the Danube-Morava-Vardar-Thessaloniki Canal using General Morphological Analysis
Issue: Vol 4 No 1 (2019)
Published date: 01-05-2019 (print) / 01-05-2019 (online)
Journal: Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
ISSN: 2520-2979
Authors: Nasir Hussain
Strategy Foresight Ltd

Dejana Jovanović Popović
University of Belgrade

Miroljub Milinčić
University of Belgrade
Keywords: modelling, canal, morphological analysis, Morava-Vardar, China, problem structuring method
DOI: 10.14254/jsdtl.2019.4-1.1
DOAJ: https://doaj.org/article/7c2a941c48074863b8a80a22aac88a73
Language: English
Pages: 6-16 (11)
Website: https://jsdtl.sciview.net/index.php/jsdtl/article/view/73
File https://jsdtl.sciview.net/index.php/jsdtl/article/view/73/46
Licenses:
Abstract

The problem structuring method of General Morphological Analysis was used to explore the factors and uncertainties to be considered in the proposed building of a canal linking the Morava and Vardar Rivers, which in recent years has taken on greater importance given its possible link in China’s one belt initiative. Facilitated workshop sessions identified five main factors – investors, risks, the motivation to invest, type of investment and long-term benefits – and 19 conditional states resulting in 1440 unique scenarios. Using specialist software and input from subject matter specialists from the fields of geography, environment and security, 81 scenarios were isolated. Modelling indicated that over two-thirds of scenarios did not feature the impact on environmental damage such as raised pollution and effect on biodiversity. Interestingly, while financial institutions and the EU did feature because of reputational and ethical reasons, non-EU governments, construction firms and some regional governments did not. The implications of these findings warrant additional research but results of this study suggest that strengthening of governance would be required to mitigate impact on the local environment.

Bibliography

1. Ardila, A. M., Rebscher, A. & Hack, J. (2017). Analysis of future land use changes and water availability in the Nicaraguan Southwest as a result of the construction of the Nicaragua Interoceanic Canal. Preprints, 2017090045. Retrieved January 19, 2019 fr

2. Dimitrijević, D. (2017). Chinese Investments in Serbia - A Joint Pledge for the Future of the New Silk Road. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 7, 64-83. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-0005

3. Foote, J. L., Gregor, J. E., Hepi, M. C., Baker, V. E., Houston, D. J., & Midgley, G. (2007). Systemic problem structuring applied to community involvement in water conservation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 645-654. https://doi.org/10

4. Franco, L. A., Cushman, M., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Project Review and Learning in the Construction Industry: Embedding a Problem Structuring Method within a Partnership Context. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 586-601. https://doi.org/10.1

5. Gregory, A. J., Atkins, J. P., Burdon, D. & Elliot, M. (2013). A Problem Structuring Method for Ecosystem-Based Management: The DPSIR Modelling Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 227, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.020

6. He, G., Zhang, L. & Lu, Y. (2009). Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Audit in Large-Scale Public Infrastructure Construction: The Case of the Qinghai–Tibet Railway. Environmental Management, 44, 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-

7. Hussain, N., & Ritchey, T. (2011). Wicked Problems. European Journal of Industrial Pharmacy, 31, 4–7. http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/wp-pharma.pdf

8. Luckman, J. (1967). An Approach to the Management of Design. Journal of Operational Research Society, 18, 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1967.68

9. Mingers, J. & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem Structuring Methods in Action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 530-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00056-0

10. Ng, H. S., Peña-Mora, F., & Tadatsugu, T. (2007). Dynamic Conflict Management in Large-Scale Design and Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23, 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(52)

11. Politica. (2019, January 5). The Chinese wonder in Serbia, investments of nearly $10 billion. Retrieved January 19, 2019 from http://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/419657/Kinesko-cudo-u-Srbiji-investicije-od-blizu-10-milijardi-dolara

12. Rhyne, R. (1981): Whole-Pattern Futures Projection Using Field Anomaly Relaxation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 19, 331-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(81)90005-6

13. Ritchey, T. (2011) Wicked Problems—Social Messes: Decision Support Modelling with Morphological Analysis. Berlin: Springer Verlag. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-642-19653-9

14. Rittel, H.W.J. & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

15. Ungureanu, L. (2009). A Dynamical Model of Water Pollution. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 10, 23-31. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/a/jepe-journal.info/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=amVwZS1qb3VybmFsLmluZm98amVwZS1qb3VybmFsfGd4Ojc0Y

16. United Nations (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Brundtland_Report

17. Zeng, Q., Wang, G. W. Y., Qu, C. & Li, K. X. (2018). Impact of the Carat Canal on the evolution of hub ports under China’s Belt and Road Initiative Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 117, 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j

18. Zwicky, F. (1948). The Morphological Method of Analysis and Construction. New York: Interscience.