Sugar prices development: The relation among selected commodity stocks exchange

Information
Title: Sugar prices development: The relation among selected commodity stocks exchange
Issue: Vol. 13, No 2, 2020
Published date: 06-2020 (print) / 06-2020 (online)
Journal: Journal of International Studies
ISSN: 2071-8330, eISSN: 2306-3483
Authors: Ľuboš Smutka
Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague

Patrik Rovný
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra

Jozef Palkovič
Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
Keywords: sugar prices, commodity, stock exchange, relations, London, New York, ISA, differences
DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-2/21
DOAJ: https://doaj.org/article/d6cdf7b12a524e1e81ee9cf046ef87eb
Language: English
Pages: 310-328 (19)
JEL classification: F14, F10, F63, Q02, Q17
Website: https://www.jois.eu/?619,en_sugar-prices-development-the-relation-among-selected-commodity-stocks-exchange
File https://www.jois.eu/files/21_875_Smutka%20et%20al.pdf
Licenses:
This paper is supported by a grant project of National Agency for Agricultural Research (NAZV). The project title is “Duality in Czech Agriculture: Advantage or Disadvantage for New Generation Agriculture?”, (QK1920398).
Abstract

World sugar market has been oscillating between surplus and deficit states. After the long-term period of surpluses, we recorded several deficits during the last ten years development and the state of global sugar stocks decreased to about 85 mln. tonnes in 2019/2020. The volume of consumption (176 mln. tonnes) passed over the volume of production (167 mln. tonnes). The last years sugar market development put world sugar prices under bearish pressure. Brazil and Australia are the only ones with a rather liberal, unprotected sugar market, while in all other countries at least the domestic market is affected by regulations. The processed paper is interested to analyse the world sugar price development at the level of several markets/stock exchanges. The objective is to identify whether there are existing or not some common features and relations influencing global and regional sugar price development. Causality and direction of causal relationship (causality in statistical meaning, better said precedency) was investigated by using Granger causality test. Evidence of long run equilibrium and number of cointegration vectors between markets was investigated by Johansen test. In final, was estimated relationship between markets by vector error correction mechanism. Reaction of prices in key markets to external impulse was expressed using impulse-response function. Based on above mentioned analyses, the strong relations were confirmed among ISA, New York 11 and London No. 5. Granger Causality test confirmed strong position of London No.5 and New York 11, which influence other markets. There was confirmed also causality in direction from New Delhi to Sao Paulo and from Sao Paulo to Mexico. Results of the VECM confirmed Granger causality and strong position of New York 11 and emphasized also role of ISA: In comparison of results obtained by correlation, causality and error correction mechanism, was confirmed important role of New York 11 in all these analyses.

Bibliography

1. Babuněk, O. (2016). Comparison of Impact of Selected Aspects on Supply, Demand and Price of Sugar in Developing and Developed Countries, in the World, in OECD and EU Countries. Listy cukrovarnické a řepařské, 132(5–6), 19.

2. Barassi M.R. & Ghoshray A. (2007). Structural Change and Long-run Relationship between US and EU Wheat Export Prices. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58, 76-90.

3. Bilyk, O., Khalikova, E., Shevchenko, A., Kochubei-Lytvynenko, O., Bondarenko, Y., & Fain, A. (2020). Effect of the complex improver on consumer properties of bakery products. Ukrainian Food Journal, 9(1). 148-158

4. Crago, L.C., Khanna, M., Barton, J., Giuliani, E. & Amaral, W. (2010). Competitiveness of Brazilian Sugarcane Ethanol Compared to US Corn Ethanol. Poster prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2010 AAEA, CAES, and

5. Čermák, M., Malec, K. and Maitah, M. (2017) “Price Volatility Modelling – Wheat: GARCH Model Application", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(4), 15-24. DOI: 10.7160/aol.2017.090402.

6. Dimpfl, T. & Peter, F. J.(2018). Analyzing volatility transmission using group transfer entropy. Energy Economics, 75, 368-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.008

7. Drabik, D., De Gorter, H., Just, D. R. & Timilsina, G. R. (2014). The economics of Brazil’s ethanol-sugar markets, mandates, and tax exemptions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(5), 1433-1450. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.080

8. Elobeid, A. & Beghin, J. (2006). Multilateral trade and agricultural policy reforms in sugar markets. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(1), 23-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00030.x

9. F.O.Licht, (2020). (available et: https://www.agra-net.com/agra/international-sugar-and-sweetener-report/); (on-line: 10/05/2020)

10. Frate, C. A. & Brannstrom, C. (2015). Will Brazil's ethanol ambitions undermine its agrarian reform goals? A study of social perspectives using Q-method. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 89-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.10.007

11. Fuller, K. & Kennedy, P.L. (2019). A determination of factors influencing sugar trade. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics 7(1), 19-29. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.283880

12. Garside, B. et al. (2004). Who gains from sugar quotas? , DESTIN DV406 Research Project: London School of Economics and Overseas Development Institute, 2004.

13. Grethe, H., Nolte, S. & Banse, M., (2008). Modelling the Efects of EU Sugar Market Liberalization on Area Allocation, Production and Trade. Contribution to conference, 107th EAAE Seminar on Modelling Agricultural and Rural Development Policies, Sevilla, J

14. Haley, S. & Polet, Z., (2011) Post-Reform European Union Sugar - Prospects for the Future, Gain Report No. E60078.

15. Haley, S. (2013). World Raw Sugar Prices The Influence of Brazilian Costs of Production and World Surplus/Deficit Measures, A Report from the Economic Research Service, 22, SSS-M-297-01.

16. Hndi B. M., Maitah, M. and Mustofa, J. (2016) “Trade Impacts of Selected Free Trade Agreements on Agriculture: The Case of Selected North African Countries", AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 8(3), 39 - 50. DOI: 10.7160/aol.2016.080304.

17. Jacomini, R.L. & Burnquist, H.L. (2018). Asymmetric price transmission in the Brazilian refined sugar market. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 73(1), 5-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-23576

18. Koo, Won W. & Taylor Richard D. (2012). 2012 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2011-2021, Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report N. 692, Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies. North Dakota State University, Fargo.

19. Kovářová, K., Nádeník, M. & Pícha, K. (2017). The Czech Republic Sugar Market Development in the Context of the Phasing out of Sugar Quota. Deturope,, 9(2), 110-117.

20. Kramer, E. (2016). U.S Sugar Beet Price Analysis. Research Papers Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 39.

21. Krejčí, T., Dostál, I., Havlíček, M., & Martinát, S. (2016). Exploring the hidden potential of sugar beet industry brownfields (case study of the Czech Republic). Transportation Research Part D, 46, 284–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.04.006

22. Lima, C. R. A., De Melo, G. R., Stosic, B. & Stosic, T. (2019). Cross-correlations between Brazilian biofuel and food market: Ethanol versus sugar. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 513, 687-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.080

23. McConnell, M, Dohlman, E. & Haley, S. (2010). World Sugar Price Volatility Intensified by Market and Policy Factors. Amber Wawes Feature, Economic research service USDA, 2010, 8(3), 28-35.

24. Moyo, S., & Spreen, T. H. (2011). An Update on the Consequences of EU Sugar Reform. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2(1), 2011, 67-76. DOI: 10.18461/ijfsd.v2i1.215

25. Nagyová, L., Horská, E., & Kádeková, Z. (2011). Food quality policy and labelling. Delhi Business Review, 12(1), 85-100.

26. Pereda, P., Christofoletti, M.A., Wen Ng, S, Claro, R.M., Duran, A.C. & Monteiro, C.A. (2019). Effects of a 20% price increase of sugar-sweetened beverages on consumption and welfare in Brazil, Working Papers, Department of Economics 2019_33, University

27. Pop, L., Rovinaru, M. & Rovinaru, F. (2013). The challenges of sugar market: an assessment from the price volatility perspective and its implications for Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, 605-614. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00071-3

28. Récky, R. (2014) The evaluation of chosen economics and marketing indicators of sugar cultivation in Slovakia In: Improving performance of agriculture and the economy: challenges for management and policy. International Scientific days 2014, SUA Nitra, 11

29. Řezbová, H., Belová A. & Škubna, O. (2013). Sugar beet production in the European Union and their future trends, Agris online Papers in Economics and Informatics, Prague, 5(4), 165-178. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162299

30. Řezbová, H. Maitah, M., Sergienko, O. I. (2015) “EU Quota Sugar Market Concentration – the Main Drivers of EU Sugar Market”, AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7 (4), 131- 142.

31. Rodrigues L. & Moraes M. (2007). Market structure of the refining industry in the Central and South Brasil region. Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology, 45(1): 93-118.

32. Serra, T., Zilberman, D. & Gil, J. (2010). Price volatility in ethanol markets. European review of agricultural economics, 38(2), 259-280. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbq046

33. Severová, L., Kopecká, L., Svoboda, R. et al. (2011). Oligopoly competition in the market with food product, Agricultural Economics - Zemědělská Ekonomika, 57(12), 580 – 588. DOI: 10.17221/107/2010-AGRICECON

34. Surca, D.E. (2017). Sugar market in the European Union and Romania. Study on price developments. Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania. 8, 217-223.

35. Svatoš, M., Maitah, M. & Belova, A. (2012). World Sugar Market – Basic Development Trends and Tendencies, Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Prague, 4(2), 73-88. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.152692

36. Taylor Richard D. (2017). 2017 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2016-2026, Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report N. 767, Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies. North Dakota State University, Fargo.

37. Zamsa, S. (2015). "World Sugar Market Outlook: 2014-2015," Revista de Economie Mondiala / The Journal of Global Economics, Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 7(2).

38. Zimmermann, B. & Zeddies, J. (2002). International Competitiveness of Sugar Production, the 13th International Farm Management Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands.