Solutions for increasing the capacities of cable cars

Information
Title: Solutions for increasing the capacities of cable cars
Issue: Vol 4 No 1 (2019)
Published date: 01-05-2019 (print) / 01-05-2019 (online)
Journal: Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
ISSN: 2520-2979
Authors: Sergej Težak
University of Maribor

Marjan Lep
University of Maribor
Keywords: gondola, public transport, dwelling time, platform, geometric modeling
DOI: 10.14254/jsdtl.2019.4-1.4
DOAJ: https://doaj.org/article/c46161d2b39e4e6dbca68ef785e76941
Language: English
Pages: 31-37 (7)
Website: https://jsdtl.sciview.net/index.php/jsdtl/article/view/78
File https://jsdtl.sciview.net/index.php/jsdtl/article/view/78/49
Licenses:
Abstract

Cableways have some potential to be used in urban public transportation, particularly uni-directional aerial cable cars with circulating cabins, called gondolas. They have several advantages, but two major problems must be solved: the capacity and the operating speed are not competitive when compared to other means of urban mass transport because of boarding procedures and slowing down and accelerating on intermediate stations. In this paper constructional solutions are presented. Boarding takes place on at least two platforms; these could be on the same level or on separate levels. At intermediate stations certain cabins are diverted to the extra platform while the majority of cabins travel with unreduced speed. Following this constructional approach, the nominal capacity of gondolas could be doubled while increasing the operational travel speed on lines with lot of intermediate stops.

Bibliography

1. Brand, P., & Davila, J. (2011). Aerial cable-car systems for public transport in low-income urban areas: lessons from Medellin, Colombia.

2. CEN, EN-12929-1. (2004). Safety requirements for passengers transportation by rope – General provisions – Part 1: Requirements for all installations. CEN/TC 242, AFNOR.

3. Clement-Werny, C., Dubois, D., Ruyet, A.L., Potier, M., Rousic, S., & Schneider, Y. (2011). Aerial ropeways as urban transport systems. Certu-STRTMG-CETE,.

4. Doppelmayr, A. (1997). Denkanstosse zur Funktionserfühlung von Einseilumlaufbahnen, Projektierung und Konstruktion im Sicherheitsregelkreissystem, basierend auf der Analyse von Vorfällen, ISBN 3-9500815-0-X, Wolfurt, Austria.

5. Heinrichs, D., & Bernet, J. S. (2014). Public Transport and Accessibility in Informal Settlements: Aerial Cable Cars in Medellín, Colombia. Transportation Research Procedia, 4, 55-67.

6. Nejez, J. (2006). Vorlesung aus Seilbahnbau. Technische Universität Graz, Graz.

7. Rexfelt, O., Schelenz, T., Karlsson, M., & Suescun, A. (2014). Evaluating the effects of bus design on passenger flow: Is agent-based simulation a feasible approach?. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 38, 16-27.

8. Transportation Research Board. (2003). TRB, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd edition [online: 2015-06-8]. Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/

9. Težak, S., Sever, D., & Lep, M. (2016). Increasing the capacities of cable cars for use in public transport. Journal of Public Transportation, 19(1), 1.-16.

10. Težak, S. (2012). Modern Cableways-The Base of Mountain Sports Tourism. In Strategies for Tourism Industry-Micro and Macro Perspectives. IntechOpen.