Port deregulation and productivity in Nigeria: Some implications for economic regulators
|Title:||Port deregulation and productivity in Nigeria: Some implications for economic regulators|
Vol 5 No 1 (2020)
Published date: 05-2020 (print) / 30-04-2020 (online)
Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
Donatus Eberechukwu Onwuegbuchunam
Department of Maritime Management Technology, Federal University of Technology Owerri, P.M.B 1526, Nigeria
|Keywords:||port deregulation, concession, productivity, privatisation, cargo throughputs|
Regulation in seaports broadly covers port safety, security, pollution and terminal operations which generally fall within the purview of national government’s administrative authority. Port deregulation policy in the era of global port reforms beginning in 1990’s, was introduced to limit government interference in commercial aspects of port operations, attract private sector funding and improve port productivity etc. The involvement of private sector in port terminal management arguably, entailed risk of collusion among new entrants. This paper examined port user welfare following private sector participation in a deregulation port environment. The Nigeria’s port terminal concession policy implementation was analysed as case study. From the findings, we demonstrated the essence for and role of economic regulator in ensuring that optimal welfare gains were achieved and maintained in post port reform regime.
1. Burns, M. G. (2015). Port Authorities and Regulatory Framework. Port Management and Operations. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Parkway, New York.
2. Chikere, C. C. (2014). Nigerian Ports: The perils of demurrage. Nigeria Daily Independent Newspaper. Retrieved 20/09/14 from http://dailyindependentnig.com/2014/09/nigerian-ports-perils-demurrage/.
3. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., & Roos, P. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of productivity Analysis, 3(1-2), 85-101.
4. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117971.
5. Halkos, G., & Tzeremes, N. (2012). Measuring seaports’ productivity: A Malmquist productivity index decomposition approach. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/40174/.
6. Leigland, J., & Palsson, G. (2007). Port Reform in Nigeria, Grid Lines, No. 1, Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF), The World Bank, Washington DC, USA.
7. Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de estadística, 4(2), 209-242.
8. Onwuegbuchunam, D.E (2014). Productivity and Efficiency in Nigeria’s Seaports: A Production Frontier Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria.
9. Portius International and EU Law Centre. (2013). Draft Chapter on Port Regulations for the IAPH Introduction to Maritime Law for Port Officials. Commissioned by Havenbedrijf Rotterdam NV.
10. Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Trujillo, L., & Nombela, G. (2000). Seaports in Estache, A., De-Rus, G. (Eds.), Privatization and Regulation of Transport Infrastructure, Guidelines for Policymakers and Regulators, WBI Development Studies, the World Bank, Washington, DC.
12. UNCTAD. (2011). How to utilize FDI to improve transport infrastructure – ports: Lessons from Nigeria, (ed.). Best Practices in Investment For Development: Case Studies In FDI. The United Nations, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Do
13. World Bank. (2007). Port Reform Toolkit, 2nd ed. Public Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility, World Bank Publication. Retrieved from https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/library/port-reform-toolkit-ppiaf-world-bank-2nd-edition.